You are currently viewing Unresolved matter : Plastic pollution treaty talks heat up with financing , bans on the table as experts meet in Bangkok.
Representation image: This image is an artistic interpretation related to the article theme.

Unresolved matter : Plastic pollution treaty talks heat up with financing , bans on the table as experts meet in Bangkok.

The meeting, organized by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), brings together over 100 experts from around the the world. They are discussing the challenges of plastic pollution, the need for financing solutions, and the development of a global framework for tackling the issue. The meeting is a crucial step towards the upcoming negotiations in Busan, where the world’s first binding treaty on plastic pollution will be finalized. The treaty aims to reduce plastic pollution globally, with a focus on addressing the issue of microplastics.

The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) has released a draft treaty on plastic pollution, aiming to address the global crisis of plastic waste. The treaty, which is expected to be finalized in 2024, aims to reduce plastic pollution and protect the environment. The draft treaty outlines key principles and commitments, including reducing plastic production, promoting recycling, and phasing out single-use plastics.

Some argue that the agreement, which aims to reduce plastic pollution in the oceans, is too vague and lacks concrete action plans. They point to the lack of specific targets and timelines for achieving these goals. The lack of concrete action plans and specific targets is a major concern for many environmental groups. They argue that the agreement is not enough to address the scale of the plastic pollution crisis. They believe that the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are a more effective framework for tackling plastic pollution.

This is a significant development because it suggests that the government is prioritizing secrecy over transparency, which can hinder public participation and accountability. The lack of public access to the meetings raises questions about the government’s commitment to open government principles.

Leave a Reply